Spanish players union against Barça game in U.S.
The Spanish Footballers’ Association (AFE) has voiced strong opposition to the scheduled LaLiga fixture between Villarreal and Barcelona set to take place in Miami on December 20. AFE president David Aganzo expressed concerns regarding the lack of transparency and insufficient information from LaLiga, emphasizing that the players cannot endorse the proposal under current circumstances. The match relocation also raises questions about competitive fairness and player welfare.
Aganzo highlighted that negotiations and discussions involving LaLiga officials, club captains, and the players of both teams have been difficult to arrange, with a planned meeting failing to materialize due to scheduling conflicts. “We sought transparency and respect towards the players,” Aganzo stated, stressing the need for clarity on the collective bargaining agreement’s compliance, logistical arrangements, and working conditions related to the overseas match.
Critically, Aganzo questioned the singular enthusiasm shown only by the two clubs involved, adding, “If this is as special as LaLiga claims, why is no other club celebrating it publicly?” He further underscored the necessity of protecting players amid increasing demands, stating that without adequate conditions, the fixture’s future is uncertain.
LaLiga responded by noting their attempts to schedule alternative meetings with AFE, which were declined as too late considering ticket sales were already underway. The players’ union has also reportedly engaged political stakeholders to explore their options, though it expressed reluctance to disrupt proceedings entirely.
A significant point of contention is the perceived sporting imbalance created by staging a league game in the United States, effectively giving Barcelona a de facto home advantage in a neutral venue. Aganzo pointed out, “Villarreal have a better chance playing at home; outside Spain, Barca has far more supporters, so this is like an away game turned into a home fixture for them.” Views shared by players such as Barça’s Frenkie de Jong and Real Madrid’s Dani Ceballos underline concerns over the competition’s integrity, with Ceballos stating this move would “adulterate” the league.
Real Madrid, a vocal critic of the match relocation, argues the decision would “give an undue sporting advantage” and set a problematic precedent for domestic competitions. LaLiga has pursued overseas fixtures since 2017 but gained momentum after UEFA recently approved two exceptional requests for domestic league games to be played abroad—one being Villarreal versus Barcelona in Miami and the other an Italian Serie B match in Perth, Australia.
Although UEFA expressed opposition to shifting domestic fixtures outside their countries, it justified accepting LaLiga’s request citing FIFA’s broader regulatory framework. LaLiga’s announcement confirming Villarreal and Barcelona’s December 20 game in Miami has intensified debate around the future of domestic league matches and player rights in an increasingly globalized football industry.
This development reflects LaLiga’s strategic push to expand its international profile and commercial footprint, yet it simultaneously raises complex questions about maintaining sporting fairness and safeguarding player welfare amid evolving global ambitions. For the players and clubs involved, the Miami fixture represents a crossroads between tradition and globalization with implications that could influence future league policies.